While PCI-e Flash cards show great performance, I am often asked about alternatives, as price for PCI-e cards is still significant and not acceptable for small companies and startups.
Intel 320 SSD appears to be a popular drive with a quite acceptable price.
I wrote about write performance of these cards, and now let’s take look on a random read workload.
I used a Cisco UCS C250 as base hardware, comparing in it:
- regular RAID10 over 8 SAS 2.5 disks
- single Intel 320 SSD directly attached to a HighPoint RocketRAID 2300
- two Intel 320 SSD in hardware RAID0 mode, attached to a LSI SAS9211-4i controller
For simulating the workload I used sysbench’s fileio random reads. Scripts and raw results available on Launchpad.
Let’s see throughput results:
| threads | Intel 320 | Intel 320 2 strip | RAID10 | ratio Intel 320 / RAID10 | ratio Intel 320 2 strip / RAID10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 30.27 | 31.18 | 3.75 | 8.07 | 8.31 |
| 2 | 55.18 | 60.49 | 6.98 | 7.91 | 8.67 |
| 4 | 95.13 | 112.85 | 12.10 | 7.86 | 9.33 |
| 8 | 143.58 | 191.64 | 19.05 | 7.54 | 10.06 |
| 16 | 174.75 | 277.70 | 26.70 | 6.54 | 10.40 |
| 32 | 174.60 | 351.84 | 32.90 | 5.31 | 10.69 |
| threads | Intel 320 SSD | Intel 320 SSD strip | RAID | ratio RAID/Intel 320 | ratio RAID/Intel 320 strip |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.53 | 0.56 | 6.13 | 11.57 | 10.95 |
| 2 | 0.72 | 0.59 | 7.27 | 10.10 | 12.32 |
| 4 | 0.89 | 0.74 | 10.07 | 11.31 | 13.61 |
| 8 | 1.24 | 0.95 | 15.63 | 12.60 | 16.45 |
| 16 | 1.76 | 1.38 | 25.52 | 14.50 | 18.49 |
| 32 | 3.33 | 2.15 | 47.35 | 14.22 | 22.02 |
As conclusion, this card provides great read performance. A single card provides 5-8x better throughput and 10-14x better response time. Striping helps to increase throughput in 8-10x and response time in 10-22x.
While there are questions about write performance (see my previous post), I think this card is very suitable for read-intensive tasks, where you can expect significant improvements.


Would be great to start using this in more of my hardware….
Hi Vadim!
im trying to run yours scripts and looks like i don’t have report-interval param in my latest sysbench version:
sysbench --report-interval
Unknown option: --report-interval.
sysbench --version
sysbench 0.4.12
are you using official release version?
I just compiled latest version from scm and working like a charm.